Monday, April 9, 2012

Egypt: The Modern Story – Sharm el Sheikh and Suez


The visit to Safaga and Luxor was our step back to antiquity, but Sharm el Sheikh and Suez Canal are stark reminders that Egypt is a major players in the world of the 21st century.

After returning from our long trip to Luxor, we were tempted to skip the Egyptian Cultural Show that Holland America was presenting, but we were pleased that we attended.  There were only four performers for the entire show and the presentation was different from other shows we have seen.  Of particular note was one of the two young men who came out on stage, a Whirling Dervish who didn’t stop twirling for between 10 and 15 minutes.  After about 5 twirls I think I would have toppled to the floor, dizzy!  But he was nonstop, fast and exceptionally precise.  He had two colorful skirts on and they made a dazzling display.  He got them off while still twirling and kept the skirts moving.  He used some colorful boxes and arranged them differently as the twirled.  It was pretty amazing!  We have heard of Whirling Dervishes before but had never seen one in action and we were quite impressed with this Middle Eastern act!

First however, we learned of an incident in Safaga/Luxor that reminds us all too well why we almost never take independent shore excursions.  We have done two of them in all our cruising plus visits with friends in Brian & Margaret in New Zealand, Gretar in Iceland, and Andrew in Australia.  The other two times involved a tour of the Vancouver Olympic venues just a few months before the 2010 Winter Games that Vancouver hosted.  The tour operator got us back to our ship in plenty of time.  Our only other independent excursion was with Jose in Rio de Janeiro early in this trip.  A friend had highly recommended Jose and we did his excellent tour of Rio on the first of our two days there.  No problems getting back on time there either.

However, everyone knows that the rule is that if one strikes out independently, it is his or her obligation to return to the ship by the final boarding, a half hour before sailing.  Our Safaga departure was set for 12 midnight since we had just a short sail from Safaga to Sharm el Sheikh.  Holland America typically will wait for shore excursions which it sponsors or if they have to leave, they will get the people who missed the ship to the next port at HAL’s expense.  If you are not with HAL and miss the ship, you get to the next port at your own expense.  And that expense could be quite considerable!  Our new friends, Bob and Nancy from West Virginia, reported that they had been on an excursion to the sites in Luxor which would include the dramatic Sound and Light Show at Karnak Temple.  They were on the last tour scheduled to get back, but their bus broke down in the desert.  The backup bus broke down as well and to make a long story short, they didn’t get back to the ship until after midnight, but the ship waited.  Because they hadn’t eaten in quite some time, Bob and Nancy went for a bite to eat before retiring and saw four people upset and visibly shaking.  These people had participated in a private tour at less expense.  But their driver and guide took a different route home which took longer than anticipated.  They arrived at the ship at 11:57 and saw the ship still there!  They otherwise would have been arriving just in time to see it  sailing away … without them.  They were told by the Hotel Manager that they were very lucky that the HAL shore excursion had delayed the departure as the ship would have otherwise left without them!  That reinforces our belief that the greater expense of the Holland America excursion justifies our choosing to go with their tours.

In Sharm el Sheikh, Barb and I made the rare decision not to do a shore excursion.  Our visit there was only to be about six hours and it would have come on the heels of our very long day in Luxor.  We chose instead to do what many cruisers do at each port and that was to just wander into town, browse the shops and see if there were any bargains.  We had been told that most, if not all shops, would be closed on Friday since that’s the Muslim holy day.  But Sharm el Sheikh is at the southern tip of the Sinai Peninsula and we wanted to say we had been on the Sinai Peninsula.  So after breakfast we went into town.  It turned out to be a greater walk than anticipated but we got to town and found that several stores had opened and more opened while we were there.  There were three cruise ships in port and apparently the lure of cruisers’ business led them to open.  So our trip to town wasn’t in vain.

Sharm el Sheikh has played a major role in “recent” Egyptian history.  I first became aware of Sharm el Sheikh at the time of the Six Day War between Israel and its Arab neighbors.  Between June 5 and 10, 1967, Israel took all of the Sinai Peninsula down to Sharm el Sheikh as a buffer between it and Egype, the Golan Heights of Syria, and the West Bank of the Jordan River from Jordan.  The three Arab nations had misjudged Israel’s military capability.   This meant that Israel and Egypt faced each other across the Suez Canal. Sharm el Sheikh at the southern tip was occupied by Israeli forces and it and the entire peninsula were occupied by Israel until after the Camp David Accords in 1978.  Even the Egyptian attack on Israel in Sinai at the time of Yom Kippur in 1973 hadn’t won Sinai back for Egypt.  Ships had been sunk in Sinai and it was out of commission for several years and represented a huge financial loss for Egypt.  But with Israel across the border, firing on Egypt, they couldn’t clean the debris from the sunken ships to allow transit through the canal.

Our new Australian friends, John and Gerda, indicated that Gerda had been in Sharm el Sheikh in 1968 and there had been virtually nothing there.  Now, it is a warm resort city with luxury hotels and a thriving business district.  However the concern over January 2011 revolution in Egypt which overthrew President Mubarek cost untold sums in lost income when tourists refused to come to Egypt.  That part of Egypt has been somewhat safer and quieter and slowly tourism is returning.  Next to Suez traffic, tourism is Egypt’s greatest source of income.

We had to sail from Sharm el Sheikh earlier than usual in order to sail up the Gulf of Suez to get in line for the convoy through the Suez Canal on Saturday.  There are usually two convoys south and one north each day and the convoys meet at the Great Bitter Lake.  If we didn’t reach the southern terminus of the canal by the appropriate time, we would be first in line for the next day’s departure!

We were told that the transit would take up to 12 hours and we would begin our sail about 6 AM.  A few quick facts about Suez, one of the two major world canals.  It had been opened in 1869 after several unsuccessful attempts to build one there.  It was engineered by the Frenchman, Ferdinand deLessups who had become personal friends with the Egyptian pasha at the time. 

When the 101 mile canal opened, it saved the journey of 7,350 miles around Africa!  Today the average toll paid per ship is about $205,600 but toll is dependent of course upon various factors including weight.  Needless to say, maintaining the canal is vital to the Egyptian economy.  We didn’t really know what to expect but now that we have completed the 9¼ hour transit, I would apply the same comment our friend Pam did about Antarctica.  Like Antarctica, we can’t even explain to anyone who hasn’t done the journey.  You just don’t go through the Suez Canal and then explain to others what you saw.  “You have to experience it.”

We were told the transit would commence about 6 AM, so shortly before 6, I pulled the curtains back to see if we had begun. We had just started the transit and Barbara Haenni was already broadcasting commentary to the outer decks and bow.  Much to our surprise, the ms Amsterdam was leading the northbound convoy!  That gave an unobstructed view ahead for us.  (A ship’s officer sat at our table for our formal night dinner and I asked how we happened to be in the lead.  He told us they like to have a very dependable ship lead because there is very little likelihood of a breakdown and it has such efficient navigational capability, sufficient speed, and quality crew, that they were pretty much assured that we wouldn’t hold up any other ship.)

We quickly got ready and went to the bow to view.  Since it can’t be adequately described, I will just mention a few key things we observed.  Most notable was the contrast between the west and east banks of the canal (the African side nearer the Nile River and the Asian side and the Sinai Peninsula).  The west bank was much greener and more lush than I expected, while just a few hundred feet away in Sinai, it was primarily desert sand.  In fact we had a real treat and apparently a rarity because when we were eating lunch, a lady at the table behind me called out, “There are camels out there!”  Sure enough in the distance and in the desert we observed up to a dozen camels.  We dashed out to the aft deck to snap a few pictures which we will try to enlarge to “prove” we saw them in their natural habitat!  We spoke to several experienced cruisers who have transited the Suez several times and none of them reported that they had ever seen a camel there before.  We felt quite proud that we saw them, thanks to the anonymous observant woman.

We also noted a lot of military security:  guard posts, active military with weapons, at least one encampment of soldiers in training, and gunnery positions.  One man commented that there seemed to be much more military presence than when he went through the canal two years ago.  He insisted it meant that Egypt was preparing to attack Israel.  Likewise his theory was that the barricades we saw from time to time along the shore were not meant, as Barbara Haenni told us, to be put in the canal to block it if that was ever needed, rather than have the canal blocked with sunken ships as occurred after the Yom Kippur War of 1973, but rather these large structures had some kind of offensive purpose.  There were also two monuments to war victims, one of which was a World War I monument and another on the Sinai side was to commemorate the Egyptians lost in the 1973 war with Israel.

There were also two small ferries that operated between the two sides of the canal as well as two bridges, one of which was more like a drawbridge with sides that could move into place across the canal when a convoy wasn’t coming through and the other a high span bridge which we cleared with no difficulty.  We spent the day watching these amazing sights and “experiencing” the Suez Canal. 

We certain saw both ancient Egypt as well as modern Egypt in our voyage.  With the unsettled situation in the Middle East, we hope that cool heads will prevail and that some kind of accommodation will allow the people of Egypt as well as Israel and other nations in that volatile region to lead their lives in peace.  But we have to admit that we were pleased to reach the Mediterranean Sea and anticipate the ports of our seventh continent in this amazing voyage, Europe!  Three weeks from now we will be home!

We hope everyone had a very happy Easter!  It seemed unusual to be away from our church and family but we enjoyed a unique sunrise service on the outdoor aft deck in the Mediterranean Sea.  The ship was brightly decorated for Easter and a wonderful brunch was served in the LaFontaine Dining Room.  Before lunch, we had an hour to check out the food carvings and creations.  The artistic decorating of food in all sorts of creative ways was a photo album all its own.  After all the hours of effort in making and displaying the food, it seemed wrong to devour the food in less than an hour!

CT

No comments:

Post a Comment